This reporter asked St-Louis if he turned to alcohol after a loss to deal with his emotions.
Although the question was asked in a humorous tone, it seemed to cross the boundaries of respect for a professional's privacy.
Martin St-Louis reacted with a smile, responding that he would not turn to alcohol to recover from a defeat, but that he recognized that "beers taste better after a victory."
Was that really a necessary question? For real there?
There is a line between legitimate professional matters and intrusions into an individual's personal life that must not be crossed. Failed in this case.
It is important to remember that coaches, like everyone else, are human beings. Asking someone about their personal habits, especially when it comes to topics as sensitive as alcohol, should be avoided altogether.
Even more so when it comes to a public figure who carries the pressure of sporting success on a daily basis. Although such a question could be perceived as intrusive, it did not provoke a violent reaction from St-Louis, who demonstrated professionalism.
Let's say there is a fine line between curiosity and indiscretion.
POLL | ||
Should the journalist have avoided this question? | ||
Yes | 109 | 81.3 % |
No | 25 | 18.7 % |
List of polls |